Re: Deliver_SM with null fields

[kovalov]

I use both, Database and GET method for my script. But I don’t see anywhere that TLV fields are parsed by bearbox, I think its logic stops on the command status and does not retrieve tlv fields in that case. I don’t see it in LOG files ether.

 I’m right?

So I need to make a changes to kannel if there is no other way?

Regards Vit.

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:29:26 +0100
"Milan P. Stanic" wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 08:45, kova...@apollo.lv wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> TLV options in config are set, example:
>>
>> group = smpp-tlv
>>
>> name = rut_addr
>>
>> tag = 0x1510
>>
>> type = octetstring
>>
>> length = 20
>>
>> About the error - I know what it means, I need to get
>>tlv fields for this
>> response. If I get this command status I need to
>>write all tlv information
>> into database for further logic.
>>
>> Kannel supports this function? If so, how can I get
>>the metadata for my
>> resp onse into database?
>>
>> I have Bearbox , SMSbox , Sqlbox.
>>
>> I don’t have metadata for response, with command
>>status != 0.
>
> Sorry, I don't use databases for DLR nor MO/MT so I
>can't help here.
>
>> Regards Vit.
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +0100
>> "Milan P. Stanic" wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 16:04, kova...@apollo.lv
>>wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I’ve done the changes to Kannel, it is working.
>> >>
>> >> Got One more problem, when I tester error
>>responses:
>> >>
>> >> I don’t Get parsed Meta data from Negative
>> >>Submit_SM_Resp, it isn’t parsed
>> >> by bearbox, dlr gets written to database with
>>error
>> &g t;>code from command
>> >> status. So if I need to receive TLV metadata from
>> >>negative response, maybe
>> >> there is a solution?
>> >
>> > Did you set smpp-tlv options in config file?
>> >
>> >> Example of Response:
>> >>
>> >> OUT     2012-02-14 15:37:12
>> >> H command_id  &nb sp;      0x80000004
>> >> H command_name       SUBMIT_SM_RESP
>> >> H sequence_number    41
>> >> H command_status     1044
>> >>   message_id                      => ''
>> >>   rut_addr_ton      &n bsp;             => 5         
>> >>0x00000003
>> >>   rut_subscriber_id               => '334455253/2'
>> >>   rut_addr                         =>
>> >>'fserhWJKDwlqwkejf'
>> > >
>> >> LOG:
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] Got PDU:
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU
>> >>0x9918ae0 dump:
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG:   type_name:
>> >>submit_sm_resp
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG:   command_id:
>> >>21474 83652 = 0x80000004
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG:  
>> >>command_status: 1044 = 0x00000403
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG:  
>> >>sequence_number: 42 = 0x0000002a
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG:   message_id:
>> >>NULL
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump
>> >>ends.
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] ERROR: SMPP[xxxx]:
>>SMSC
>> >>returned error code
>> >> 0x00000453 (Vendor-specific error, please refer to
>> >>your SMPP provider) in
>> >> response to submit _sm.
>> >
>> > You should ask provider what meand 0x00000453 error
>> >code.
>> > It is in the range of 'Reserved for SMSC vendor
>>specific
>> >err ors'.
>> >
>> >> 2012-02-14 15:35:32 [720] [6] DEBUG: SMSC[xxxxx]:
>> >>creating DLR message
>> >>
>> >> Regards Vit.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 10 Fe b 2012 17:09:42 +0100
>> >> "Milan P. Stanic" wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:24, kova...@apollo.lv
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >> Hello,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I’m trying to change File /gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Maybe anyone have stept in to such problem, and
>> >>has
>> >> >>an advice where to
>> >> >> change the file will be better?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I need to receive Deliver SM with 0 fields, so
>>I’m
>> >> > ;>wondering if I catch
>> >& gt; >> Delivers With Null source address and
>>change the
>> >>data
>> >> >>of those fields.
>> >> >> Most of time after compilation I get
>>segmentation
>> >> >>fault..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1602: dlrmsg = handle_dlr(smpp,
>> >> >>pdu->u.deliver_sm.source_addr,
>> >> >> pdu->u.deliver_sm.short_message,
>> >> >>pdu->u.deliver_sm.message_payload,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> pdu->u.deliver_sm.receipted_message_id,
>> >> >>pdu->u.deliver_sm.message_state ,
>> >> >> pdu->u.deliver_sm.network_error_code);
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here I can catch if I have an empty source
>>address
>> >> >>like that:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> if ( pdu->u.deliver_sm.source_addr == NULL)   
>>{}
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Any help would be appreciated
>> &g t;> >
>> >> > Could you send a patch with your changes and
>>tell
>> >>which
>> >> >version of
>> >> > Kannel you use as a base for your modifications?
>> >> >
>> >> > And, questions about code modification/change
>> >>should be
>> >> >posted to
>> >> > the de...@kannel.org, IMHO.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Regards.  Vit
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:46:04 +0200
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> > I’ve stept into a problem, Is it possible to
>> >>handle
>> >> >> >Deliver_SM with empty fields except TLV
>> >>fields?how?
>> >> >> > I get an Error, that its Null, here is my
>>LOG:
>> >> >> > >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>Optional
>> >> > > >parameter tag (0x1506)
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>>Optional
>> >> >> >parameter length read as 5
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG: Found
>> >> >>configured
>> >> >> >optional parameter `rut_message_id'
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>>Optional
>> >> >> >parameter tag (0x1508)
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>>Optional
>> >> >> >parameter length read as 1
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG: Found
>> >> >>configured
>> >> >> >optional parameter `rut _report_type'
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>>Optional
>> >> >> >parameter tag (0x1500)
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>>Optional
>> >> >> >parameter length r ead as 14
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG: Found
>> >> >>configured
>> >> >> >optional parameter `rut_created_ts'
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15 :04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>SMPP[xxxx]:
>> >> >>Got
>> >> >> >PDU:
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG: SMPP
>>PDU
>> >> >>0x850eb1
>> >> >> > 0 dump:
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>type_name:
>> >> >> >deliver_sm
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>command_id:
>> >> >>5 =
>> >> >> >0x00000005
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>command_status:
>> >> >> >0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > sequence_num ber: 1 = 0x00000001
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>service_type:
>> >> >> >NULL
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > source_addr_ton: 0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:0 4:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>source_addr:
>> >> >> >NULL
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>dest_addr_ton:
>> >> >> >0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>dest_addr_npi:
>> >> >> >0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > destination_addr: NULL
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEB UG:
>> >>esm_class: 4
>> >> >>=
>> >> >> >0x00000004
>> >> >> > 2012-02- 07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>protocol_id:
>> >> >> >0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>priority_flag:
>> >> >> >0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > schedule_delivery_time: NULL
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG: >> >
>> >>validity_period: NULL
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > registered_delivery: 0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > replace_if_present_flag: 0 = 0 x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>data_coding:
>> >> >>0 >> >> >= 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >> > sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>sm_length: 0
>> >> >>=
>> >> >> >0x00000000
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>short_message:
>> >> >> >""
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>rut_message_id:
>> >> >> > ;"48024"
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >> >>rut_created_ts:
>> >> >> >"20120207150639"
>> >> >> > 2 012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG :
>> >> >> > rut_report_type: "0"
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG: SMPP
>>PDU
>> >> >>dump
>> >> >> >ends.
>> >> ; >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] DEBUG:
>> >>SMPP[xxxx]
>> >> >> >handle_pdu, got DLR
>> >> >> > 2012-02-07 15:04:40 [12259] [6] ERROR:
>> >>SMPP[xxx]:
>> >> >>got
>> >> >> >DLR but could not find message or was not
>> >>interested
>> >> >>in
>> >> >> >it id<> dst&l t;(null)>, type<-1>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regards.
>> >> >> WARNING: gnome-keyring:: couldn't connect to:
>> >> >>/tmp/keyring-CLI2Mn/pkcs11: No such file or
>> >>directory
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Kind regards, Milan
>> >> >
>>--------------------------------------------------
>> >> > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net
>> >> > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML
>>code
>> >>or
>> >> >documents in
>> >> > proprietary format (word, excel, pps and so on)
>> >> >
>> >> WARNING: gnome-keyring:: couldn't connect to:
>> >>/tmp/keyring-oldPme/pkcs11: No such file or
>& gt;directory
>> >
>> > --
>> > Kind regards, Milan
>> > --------------------------------------------------
>> > Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net
>> > Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code
>>or
>> >documents in
>> > proprietary format (word, excel, pps and so on)
>> >
>> WARNING: gnome-keyring:: couldn't connect to:
>>/tmp/keyring-oldPme/pkcs11: No such file or directory
>
> --
> Kind regards, Milan
> --------------------------------------------------
> Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net
> Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code or
>documents in
> proprietary format (word, excel, pps and so on)
>