I have a question. How do you send 1 long message to Kannel via multiple-part messages ?
I'm using sqlbox setup. If I do split a long message in multiple and insert them into send_sms, kannel should send separate messages, not the long one, right? On Mar 7, 2012 6:45 PM, "Rene Kluwen" <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote: > > One possible solution is not to let Kannel handle multiple-part messages > but do it yourself. > > So instead of passing one long message to Kannel, you split the message up > in multiple parts and send the different parts to Kannel (including UDH). > > Each with a different DLR url. > > This way, you will get a failure message per message part. > > > > == Rene > > > > > > *From:* users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On > Behalf Of *Alexander Malysh > *Sent:* Wednesday, 07 March, 2012 13:51 > *To:* Ashish Agarwal > *Cc:* users@kannel.org > *Subject:* Re: NACK reporting help > > > > Hi, > > > > this is not easy to fix because you send only one but long message and > awaiting only one DLR. > > BUT kannel splits message into peaces for you and receive two DLRs. How > would you put both reason > > codes into one DLR? In you case that would be easy because they both equal > but what do you do if not? > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > Am 06.03.2012 um 12:20 schrieb Ashish Agarwal: > > > > Hello All, > > > > Any update on the below query. > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ashish Agarwal <ashisha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have been using kannel for over 2 years now and I am currently using the > latest 1.5 version of kannel. I have come across an issue with NACK reports > generated for messages that fails or are rejected by the smsc. > > > > I have the following problem:- > > > > As per the PDU user receives the *command_status: 1153 = 0x00000481* from > the smsc but the kannel esme does not interpret it correctly. > > > > e.g. > > > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:XXXX] [SVC:XXXX] [ACT:XXX] > [BINF:] [FID:] [META:] [from:XXX] [to:XXXXXXX] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:19] [msg: > *185*:1..Create a basic account (Pictorial Representation)..Create a FREE > basic account on kareeredge.com and start searching and applying for jobs > through your personal dashboard right away.] [udh:0:] > > > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 Receive DLR [SMSC:XXX] [SVC:XXXX] [ACT:] [BINF:] > [FID:] [META:] [from:XXXX] [to:XXXXXXX] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16] [msg:5:* > NACK/*] [udh:0:] > > > > > > > > As you see NACK/ should contain NACK/*0x00000481. *I have tried this > with multiple cases and have found out that when esme submits more than 160 > characters of message and the message is rejected by the smppbox we do not > receive the NACK report correctly whereas when message text is less than > 160 characters esme receive the report correctly as below:- > > > > > > 2012-02-22 17:23:10 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:XXXX] [SVC:XXXX] [ACT:XXX] > [BINF:] [FID:] [META:] [from:XXXX] [to:XXXX] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:19] [msg:* > 75*:Dear This is remind to u that,Please sms to 56767 to get more > products Free] [udh:0:] > > 2012-02-22 17:23:10 Receive DLR [SMSC:SIP11] [SVC:smssip1] [ACT:] [BINF:] > [FID:] [META:] [from:INFINI] [to:919900000147] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16] > [msg:73:*NACK/0x00000481/Vendor-specific error, please refer to your SMPP > provider*] [udh:0:] > > > > Also %A value in dlr-url gives the same output as mentioned above, because > of which we are not able to trace the exact reason for the sms failure in > case of sms text more than 160 characters. > > > > For supporting also find the pdu dump of the message text of 185 > characters:- > > > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [15] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [15] DEBUG: new split_parts created > 0x2aaab4135f70 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [15] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to boxc: > <sqlbox> > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: throughput (0.00,0.00) > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: Sending PDU: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x2aaab413ee00 dump: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x00000004 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 192708 = > 0x0002f0c4 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: service_type: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x00000005 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: source_addr: "XXX" > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 2 = 0x00000002 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x00000001 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: destination_addr: "XXXXXXXXXX" > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: esm_class: 67 = 0x00000043 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: protocol_id: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: priority_flag: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: schedule_delivery_time: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 1 = 0x00000001 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: 0 = > 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data_coding: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sm_length: 159 = 0x0000009f > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: short_message: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: Octet string at 0x2aaab4172160: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: len: 159 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: size: 1024 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: immutable: 0 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 05 00 03 90 02 01 31 2e > 3f 43 72 65 61 74 65 20 ......1.?Create > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 61 20 62 61 73 69 63 20 > 61 63 63 6f 75 6e 74 20 a basic account > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 28 50 69 63 74 6f 72 69 > 61 6c 20 52 65 70 72 65 (Pictorial Repre > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 73 65 6e 74 61 74 69 6f > 6e 29 0d 0a 43 72 65 61 sentation)..Crea > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 74 65 20 61 20 46 52 45 > 45 20 62 61 73 69 63 20 te a FREE basic > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 61 63 63 6f 75 6e 74 20 > 6f 6e 20 6b 61 72 65 65 account on karee > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 72 65 64 67 65 2e 63 6f > 6d 20 61 6e 64 20 73 74 redge.com and st > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 61 72 74 20 73 65 61 72 > 63 68 69 6e 67 20 61 6e art searching an > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 64 20 61 70 70 6c 79 69 > 6e 67 20 66 6f 72 20 6a d applying for j > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 6f 62 73 20 74 68 72 6f > 75 67 68 20 79 6f 75 obs through you > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: more_messages_to_send: 1 = > 0x00000001 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: throughput (1.00,0.00) > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: Sending PDU: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x2aaab413ee00 dump: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x00000004 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 192709 = > 0x0002f0c5 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: service_type: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x00000005 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: source_addr: "XXX" > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 2 = 0x00000002 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x00000001 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: destination_addr: "XXXXXXXXXX" > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: esm_class: 67 = 0x00000043 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: protocol_id: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: priority_flag: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: schedule_delivery_time: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: 0 = > 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data_coding: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x00000000 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sm_length: 38 = 0x00000026 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: short_message: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: Octet string at 0x2aaab4139270: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: len: 38 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: size: 1024 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: immutable: 0 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 05 00 03 90 02 02 72 20 > 70 65 72 73 6f 6e 61 6c ......r personal > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 20 64 61 73 68 62 6f 61 > 72 64 20 72 69 67 68 74 dashboard right > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: data: 20 61 77 61 79 2e > away. > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: throughput (2.00,0.00) > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: throughput (2.00,0.00) > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: Got PDU: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x2aaab413ee00 dump: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm_resp > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483652 = 0x80000004 > > *2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 1153 = 0x00000481 > * > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 192708 = > 0x0002f0c4 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: message_id: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. > > *2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] ERROR: SMPP[XXXX]: SMSC returned error > code 0x00000481 (Vendor-specific error, please refer to your SMPP provider) > in response to submit_sm.* > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: Set split msg status to 3 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: throughput (2.00,0.00) > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: throughput (2.00,0.00) > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: Got PDU: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x2aaab413ee00 dump: > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm_resp > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483652 = 0x80000004 > > *2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 1153 = 0x00000481 > * > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 192709 = > 0x0002f0c5 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: message_id: NULL > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. > > *2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] ERROR: SMPP[XXXX]: SMSC returned error > code 0x00000481 (Vendor-specific error, please refer to your SMPP provider) > in response to submit_sm.* > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: Set split msg status to 3 > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: Parts of concatenated message failed. > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMSC[XXXX]: creating DLR message > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMSC[XXXX]: DLR = > http://XX.XX.XX.XX/apps/report1/dlr.php?status=%A&type=%d&id=27-1&smscid=%i > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[XXXX]: throughput (2.00,0.00) > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [18] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to boxc: > <smsbox> > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [18] DEBUG: boxc_sender: sent message to > <127.0.0.1> > > 2012-02-22 17:24:31 [6329] [17] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got ack > > 2012-02-22 17:24:34 [6329] [17] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: heartbeat with load > value 0 received > > > > > > I think it is a bug with smsbox. Please help. > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Ashish > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Ashish Agarwal > > >
