Hi Alex,

Thank you for the reply.

Is kannel 1.5.X or SVN versions production ready? We are processing around 10M SMS/month and we cannot change unless the new version is production ready.

Best regards,
Paulo Correia

Em 25-11-2013 11:00, Alexander Malysh escreveu:
Hi,

use kannel SVN or at least 1.5.X where priority queue implemented.

Alex

Am 21.11.2013 um 11:46 schrieb Paulo Correia <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

Hi all!

Again I have the same situation:

  * More than 20K messages pending:
    curl -s
    'http://kannel-host:kannel-port/store-status?password=*********'
    <http://kannel-host:kannel-port/store-status?password=*********%27>
    | wc -l
    29291
  * Most of the pending messages were submitted with priority=0
  * One of the messages sent to kannel with priority=2 and is still
    pending after 45minutes ... it should have been sent before the
    others

Is there a way to resolve this?
I'm using kannel-1.4.3: bearerbox and smsbox (no sqlbox) with spool storage.

Any help is appreciated!

Best regards,
Paulo Correia

On 18-11-2013 09:39, Paulo Correia wrote:
Hi again!

Has anyone ever experienced strange behaviour with priorities on kannel 1.4.3 for large amount of messages? In this case we are just using smsbox and bearerbox and for large amounts of messages (over 100/second and over 20K messages) we tend to get most in the spool and the priorities seem to be changed.

Best regards,
Paulo Correia

Em 06-11-2013 12:14, Paulo Correia escreveu:
Hi!

I'm having some trouble with the priority parameter of the sendsms not being respected on kannel 1.4.3.

If I send a large ammount of messages to kannel with sendsms, let's say around 20000, most of them with priorities 0 or 1, and in the middle of them I send some other messages with priorities 2 or 3, I tippically get some of the messages with higher priority being held back, waiting for some lower priority messages to be sent to the SMSC.

The SMSC used is EMI/UCP.

Is this the normal behaviour? Is there a way to make the messages with higher priority to be sent before the others?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Paulo Correia







Reply via email to