thanks for sharing your thoughts.

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi
>
> As far as I know, there is no way to decrease the time kannel looks
> for MO. You might want to hack the code to have that.
>
> Note that MT(outbound) and MO(inbound) and also dlr use the same
> channel, therefore the more time you spent on MO the less time you
> have for MT.
>
> Usually MT traffic is much bigger than MO but might change depending
> on the service you are providing; thus if you hack the code, think on
> creating a parameter you can change on config file instead of
> hardcoding it.
>
> Also consider posting your patch on devel list so it might be included
> in kannel future releases.
>
> I think you will have better results by fine tunning CNMI command
> since it will trigger a call to kannel when receiving a MO. I usually
> use CNMI in addition to sim-buffering since, for some unknown reasons,
> sometimes CNMI does not notify kannel about MO -or kannel is busy-
> thus MO start being held on SIM. Sim-buffering will check periodically
> and if it happens to be stuck MO it will get them.
>
> Regards
>
> Alvaro
>
> |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
> celular y Nextel
> en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
> SMS y GPRS online
>               Visitenos en www.perusms.com
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:11 AM, aruna priyankara
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I figured that to recivive a SMS to Kannel system takes few minutes
> > (Considerable time). How i decrease that time to make the SMS reciving
> > faster.
> >
> > Note : SMS reciving polling time.
> >
> > REgards
> > Aruna
>
>


-- 
--

Frederick Ofosu-Darko

Service Delivery Analyst



Excellence. Integrity. Reliability.

Web: www.rancard.com

Email: [email protected]

Office: +233.289.529.573, +233.0302.258.189

Mobile: +233.245.246.176

Reply via email to