I am using GET (CGI-BIN/SENDSMS) to inject sms at kannel and the performance of kannel is just gr8 as i am not using any SQL operations at Kannel level so that it can work at full speed without any dependency.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Makhanu Sinja <jeysi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tapan By using curl to send post to kannel, would the performance > equal to what you stated? > > On 4/15/15, Tapan Kumar Thapa <tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I do not want any fight here however here is my comments. > > > > If we use SQLBOX, below are the extra operations which happened. > > > > 1. Select from send_sms table > > 2. Delete from send_sms table > > 3. Insert into sent_sms table > > 4. Update sent_sms table once DLR received > > > > FOR EVERY SMS. > > > > As per my experience, if we connect any DB with kannel, it actually slow > > down the overall performance of kannel. In your case if you don't have > > MySQL in-between you might have achieved 500 TPS with same hardware. > > > > Regards > > Tapan Thapa > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:37 PM, spameden <spame...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> 2015-04-15 7:13 GMT+03:00 Tapan Kumar Thapa <tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com > >: > >> > >>> If application is going to send huge number of messages via kannel than > >>> i > >>> think we should not configure kannel anyhow with MySQL (Or Any other > >>> database) as All databases actually slow the performance of kannel due > >>> to > >>> select/insert/update/delete operations. > >>> > >> > >> I do not agree with you on this. > >> > >> We've been using sqlbox for quite some time without any problems with > >> huge > >> load some time ago (about 200-300 MT/sec real speed with multiple > >> uplinks). > >> > >> We didn't log DLR reports tho, just updated MT records with relevant > >> fresh > >> information from DLR. > >> > >> In most cases speed issue is SMSC issue not kannel at all if you do > >> everything right. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> We should make our own application in front of kannel for logging and > >>> any > >>> other operations. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Alberto Mijares <amijar...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi guys, > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to send bearerbox access logs directly to a MySQL table. I > >>>> think I could try > >>>> > >>>> group = core > >>>> ... > >>>> access-log = "/path/to/any/socket" > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> and have a script reading the socket, etc... > >>>> > >>>> Have anyone done this before? Any advise before I put my hands on > >>>> would be appretiated. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Alberto Mijares > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > -- > -- > Kind Regards. > *Makhanu Sinja.* > +254 (0) 72168 0868 > > *I do know everything, just not all at once. It's a virtual memory > problem.* >
