Howdy. I've noticed a variance in the download time of a file depending on the method of download, and I'm hoping to shave off overhead. I'm using the standard s3 provider. That stats I present are consistent between my office and my home within +/-100 ms. In shortened form:
- Timing via driver.get_container().get_object().download() get_container: 431.4596652984619 ms get_object: 808.0205917358398 ms download: 8257.043838500977 ms Complete, downloaded 8.15 MB Timing via driver.get_object().download() get_object: 811.8221759796143 ms download: 4801.661729812622 ms Complete, downloaded 8.15 MB - In the first case, it appears that getting the container has significant overhead and should be avoided if possible--which I can do--and trims 400-500 ms per download (for small files, this is significant). Is my observation and conclusion correct? In the second case, I want to examine is the .get_object() requirement to download a file. This adds another significant overhead on the order of 700-900 ms. Is there a way to bypass this? I have many small files where the .get_object() time exceeds that of the .download() time! import std.newbie.disclaimer Thanks! Chris
