[CCing users and trimming out your config for the list] Hi Martin,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Martin Grabner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alberto, > > I've compiled the ipk myself and all seems to work now. Also tried to > reconnect while running lispmob and that works zoo without any problems. > Thanks! > That's good to hear! :) > > I've 2 other questions regarding lisp in general: > > 1. I use my EID 153.16.45.224/28 at 3 different sites and splitted it up > into 153.16.45.224/29, 153.16.45.232/30 and 153.16.45.236/30. Is it > normal that traffic between this lisp sites are routed via PxTR while > connections to other sites are going directly to the registered RLOCs as it > should? If yes - is it possible to split my EID up in this /29 and 2 /30 > networks? If not - where could be a problem in my configuration? > You should be able to split your prefix in as many sub-prefixes you want as long those do not overlap and your allocation was provided with the "allow-more-specific" option. I think you are good here. One possible reason for the pattern you are observing (traffic going through the PxTRs) may be caused by your RLOC configuration. It could be that one end is offering only IPv6 while the other only IPv4. Do you see this message in your logs? DBG_2, "select_locs_from_maps: Source and destination RLOCs have different afi" > > 2. I experienced that some (non lisp) sites aren't reachable over lisp > (and also my EID Space is not reachable from some non-lisp Internet > connections). On some networks the connection to my EID space works one > day, but stops working the on the other day and vice-versa. Some sites like > speedtest.net aren't reachable at all (answers to ping but can't get the > website loaded). Can't really figure out whats the problem here. > The problem is probably not on your side. We are aware of some issues on the beta-network that prevent connectivity to/from some parts of the Internet. We are sorry about that, but it's a best effort network run by volunteers and their availability of time/resources is limited :( > > Here is my config of one site - the configs of the other sites are looking > pretty much the same excpect of EID mappings, interfaces/weights/priorities > and layout for non-Openwrt version (same ETRs/ITRs and other settings): > [snip] > > Are you seeing any issues within my configuration regarding my 2 problems > with lisp? > You config looks fine. You only need to be careful with which AFI you choose for your RLOCs to ensure that your sites are directly reachable from each other (as I said above it may be the reason for your PxTR detouring). Besides, I see that you use several Map Servers, however your mapping needs to be allocated in advance in any Map Server you want to use. Despite it won't affect the correct behaviour of the system (the additional Map Register messages will be silently ignored), there is no need to define more Map Servers beyond the one that you were assigned. Hope this helps, Alberto > > Best regards, > Martin > > *Gesendet:* Montag, 19. Januar 2015 um 12:36 Uhr > *Von:* "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal" <[email protected]> > *An:* "Martin Grabner" <[email protected]> > *Cc:* LISPmob <[email protected]> > *Betreff:* Re: [LISPmob-users] PPP/3G connection issue with RLOC on newer > lispmob versions > Hi Martin, > > We have fixed the issue and submitted a commit to the 'testing' branch. > Please try again with the new code and let us know if the problem is now > solved. > > Will you compile the ipk yourself or shall we generate one for you? > > Thanks, > Alberto > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal < > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Martin, >> >> Thanks for letting us know! We have done some preliminary tests and can >> confirm the behavior you have detected. We'll dig into it and try to solve >> the issue ASAP :) >> >> Best, >> Alberto >> >> >
