Murthy E-G19462 wrote: > Chad, > > Agree with you. We should have public header files in both the > controller and payload rpms. > Thanks for pointing out. It will be fixed in next drop.
Isn't it a devel rpm you are talking about? What are public header files, I hope you mean the SAF headers and nothing internal? Regards, Hans > > Thanks > Murthy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Chad Tindel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Friday, October 12, 2007 9:29 AM > *To:* Murthy E-G19462 > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Users] MIB files in rpm > > We felt MIBs are going to be colocated with element manager > rather than > the network > element itself. So we didn't included them in the controller RPM. > > > > Hey Murthy- > > In the next release can you guys add an include directory to > /opt/opensaf/controller and /opt/opensaf/payload, and throw all the > opensaf (including SAF) header files in there? It would be nice to > have a standard directory for these things to exist on all opensaf > boxes. You can't always be sure that the opensaf source will be on > every box where you might want to build applications, and even if it > is there is no standard place for where to put the source code. > > Thanks, > > Chad > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users
