-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Zülke wrote: > That is bad, because it could also refer to the framework's internal > "engine" to execute something.
This is a moot point. We define the terminology. We need something suitable that isn't ambiguous with existing terminology, not something that could potentially be used maybe someday somewhere else. Noah -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknCYrAACgkQhitK+HuUQJQ4vgCfRMwRFNfljYmQMmHUbh6hD/DE 1PYAoLeRJ0DfZuh9tuGfErmIAjh4vhKc =D6BD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
