indeed, it seems to be related to 9.4 rollout, as the 1rst server where it 
happens is now in 9.4, 
it upgraded because I did --allowerasing which removed 
network-scripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 

but still this morning on 9.3 , after a dnf clean all I have the same error [1] 
, is it a question a cache / metadataExpire which seems to be 24H [2] ? 

one the server that moved to 9.4 , I cannot reinstall network-scripts , I have 
to configure manually the network after reboot (ip addr add, ip route add ...) 
how can I recover network-scripts ? 

thanks . 

[1] 
# dnf update 
AlmaLinux 9 - AppStream 10 MB/s | 7.8 MB 00:00 
AlmaLinux 9 - BaseOS 3.8 MB/s | 2.4 MB 00:00 
AlmaLinux 9 - Extras 30 kB/s | 17 kB 00:00 
Build Factory packages for Containers 7.5 kB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 - x86_64 24 MB/s | 21 MB 00:00 
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 5.1 kB/s | 
2.5 kB 00:00 
Error: 
Problem: cannot install both initscripts-10.11.6-1.el9.x86_64 from baseos and 
initscripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 from @System 
- package network-scripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 from @System requires 
initscripts(x86-64) = 10.11.5-1.el9, but none of the providers can be installed 
- cannot install the best update candidate for package 
initscripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 
- problem with installed package network-scripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or 
'--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only 
best candidate packages) 

[2] 
# cat almalinux-baseos.repo 
[baseos] 
name=AlmaLinux $releasever - BaseOS 
mirrorlist=https://mirrors.almalinux.org/mirrorlist/$releasever/baseos 
enabled=1 
gpgcheck=1 
countme=1 
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-AlmaLinux-9 
metadata_expire=86400 
enabled_metadata=1 



De: "Jonathan Wright" <jonat...@almalinux.org> 
À: "jehan procaccia" <jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu> 
Cc: users@lists.almalinux.org 
Envoyé: Mardi 7 Mai 2024 02:08:15 
Objet: Re: [AlmaLinux Users] package broken, initscripts-10.11.6-1.el9 brakes 
network-scripts-10.11.5 

I bet you were trying this during the 9.4 rollout this morning. 

Do a `dnf clean all` and try another update and I bet you'll find yourself on 
9.4 ;) 

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 7:05 PM jehan Procaccia < [ 
mailto:jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu | jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu ] > wrote: 





Hi 

since few hours (it worked fine yesterday at least) , a dnf update on different 
of my alma 9.3 systems fails with this error 


# dnf update 
Last metadata expiration check: 2:03:50 ago on Mon 06 May 2024 08:26:51 PM 
CEST. 
Error: 
Problem: cannot install both initscripts-10.11.6-1.el9.x86_64 from baseos and 
initscripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 from @System 
- package network-scripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 from @System requires 
initscripts(x86-64) = 10.11.5-1.el9, but none of the providers can be installed 
- cannot install the best update candidate for package 
initscripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 
- problem with installed package network-scripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or 
'--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only 
best candidate packages) 


if I do a --allowerasing , update does proceed but it removes package 
network-scripts-10.11.5-1.el9.x86_64 , 

then, at next reboot network is not configured anymore, indeed networks-scripts 
(ifup ...) is not there anymore 

did someone broke something in packages dependencies ? 


thanks . 

PS: systeme before update 


# cat /etc/os-release 
NAME="AlmaLinux" 
VERSION="9.3 (Shamrock Pampas Cat)" 
ID="almalinux" 
ID_LIKE="rhel centos fedora" 
VERSION_ID="9.3" 

_______________________________________________ 
AlmaLinux Users mailing list -- [ mailto:users@lists.almalinux.org | 
users@lists.almalinux.org ] 
To unsubscribe send an email to [ mailto:users-le...@lists.almalinux.org | 
users-le...@lists.almalinux.org ] 





-- 
Jonathan Wright 
AlmaLinux Foundation 
Mattermost: [ https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan | chat ] 

Reply via email to