Zitat von Martijn Brinkers <[email protected]>: > Hi Andreas, > >> Half an hour ago i thought of asking for a release candidate and >> voila... ;-) >> Unfortunately there is nothing in for us today :-( > > I'm sure there will be plenty of new features in future versions that > will please you :)
No doubt at all :-) >> May i ask what the timeframe (if any) is for the following features >> (sort by importance IMHO) >> >> - DSN support according to RFC 1891 >> ( Needed to get DSN request through when sending mail) > > Isn't this the task of the MTA (i.e. of Postfix)? afaik Postfix supports > RFC 3461 which is the succession of RFC 1891. I probably misunderstand > your request so could you explain to me what you mean with "DSN support > according to RFC 1891"? The problem is that the whole *chain* of smtp servers up to the recpient inbox must support DSN which is a extension of ESMTP, to be useful. In the Djigzo case the Java based James SMTP server does not support DSN until recently?? So it is more a problem of James than a problem with Postfix or Djigzo actually... The DSN ends at the Djigzo gateway because of this so it is not possible to request a DSN beyond there. >> - Automatic public key fetch by LDAP >> ( Needed to make it easier to get public keys from services like >> www.bridge-ca.org) > > I might be working on this feature next because a client might have a > need for this feature. I do not have a clear timeframe but it shouldn't > take too long. Nice to here! >> - User viewable tagging (subject extension) for incoming >> signed/encrypted mail >> ( Sometimes it is really useful if the user is able to check) > > If I understand you, you want to add some sort of banner to the message > containing the security information? something similar to what's added > to the headers but now visible for the end-user? Yes , this should be a easy work around to see if the message was signed/encrypted before it reached the gateway. No Outlook user willl every read e-mail headers :-( >> - Timestamp support when signing >> ( Not really useful today but more in a long term if clients or >> mailarchives are able to check ) > > I haven't had time to think about this. From our previous discussion the > biggest problem with this is client-side support for checking the > timestamp'd signature. The request has been placed in the development > agenda but with a low priority. No problem, i will try to get involved at Thunderbird etc. to see if there is some work in progress on the crypto part. Maybe there will be a chance to throw it in :-) Regards Andreas _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.djigzo.com/lists/listinfo/users
