On 02/01/2011 12:36 PM, Manuel Faux wrote: > > I think a gateway solution should not weaken the security of a > desktop-to-desktop scenario, in situations it is not necessary in. The reason to use a gateway is that most users find it too hard to use email encryption properly. If your end users will not use encryption, then it's better to have gateway to gateway encryption than no encryption at all. If you're willing to force your user to use desktop encryption, then you don't need a gateway for encryption. The use of a gateway would be limited to issuing certificates and certificate management and such.
dagdag Christine > I use > a gateway scenario, because I want to benefit from the advantages like a > centralized archive, an enforceable security policy and the transparency > in front of my users. On the one hand I share your opinion, that in general > you should assume to trust your internal infrastructure, but on the other > hand there may be employees with different responsibilities which may not > share same trust level. > > I have noticed, that other products refuse to decrypt messages in such a > scenario. I just wanted to make sure you are aware of this feature and > wanted to hear your opinion about it. > > Kind Regards, > > Manuel Faux > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.djigzo.com/lists/listinfo/users > -- dagdag is just a two-character rotation of byebye. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.djigzo.com/lists/listinfo/users
