Zitat von Martijn Brinkers <[email protected]>:

On 07/04/2012 05:28 PM, [email protected] wrote:

Zitat von Martijn Brinkers <[email protected]>:

Hi,

Version 2.4.0-3 of the DJIGZO gateway is released.

This is the same version as the last release candidate so if you already
installed 2.4.0-3 you do not need to reinstall this version.

Release notes:

New

* Sign and encrypt tags can be added to the subject for incoming signed
  and/or encrypted email (GATEWAY-36)
* Signer and sender address mismatch detection has been added
  (GATEWAY-21)
* S/MIME encrypt mailet can selectively encrypt headers (this is mainly
  used in combination with DJIGZO for Android)

Disabled by default, i guess??

Yes by default disabled.


* S/MIME encryption and signing algorithm can be set per recipient or
  domain.

The default was SHA1/3DES until now, no?

The default is still SHA1/3DES


I ask because we have a problem at one customer site that their content
filter crashes badly since we have this release at work. We sign all
outgoing mail and there were no problems with this site until now.
Disable S/MIME for this site save their content filter, but it would be
interessting what really have changed for signed mails.

Afaik the only change that might have had an influence on the digital
signatures was an update of the Bouncycastle library (the Java library
used for digital signatures etc.).

Does your client use an S/MIME gateway? Did they report a specific error
or did it just crash?

It is a spam (content)-filter with no S/MIME capabilities as far as i know. It just crashs and eat up the mail. We got a "550 could not process your mail" and the recipient a mail with no subject and 0 byte size. So while it is clearly their fault it would be helpful to have more details for a bug report to the maker of the spam filter.

Thanks

Andreas


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.djigzo.com/lists/listinfo/users

Reply via email to