On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and
> > > before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good
> > > product.
> >
> > Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't
> > appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last
> > release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system
> > libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
> >
> > If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and
> > installing it on your F22 system.
> >
> > --
> > Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora
> > - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4
>
> Ed,
>
> Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very
> far :
>
> [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
> libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
> -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>
> I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap,
> [email protected], to see if I could persuade him to maintain the
> package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.
>
> This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not
> added to it since 2007.
>
> If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.
>
> Greg
>
Hi
This worked OK for me
I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately
2015_07_10
Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror
Installed on F22 as follows
dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
Hope it helps
John
========================================================================================================
========================================================================================================
=========================
Package Arch
Version Repository
Size
========================================================================================================
========================================================================================================
=========================
Installing:
CharLS x86_64
1.0-8.fc21 fedora
66 k
aeskulap x86_64
0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 @commandline
1.1 M
dcmtk x86_64
3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora
3.9 M
gconfmm26 x86_64
2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora
46 k
libglademm24 x86_64
2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora
42 k
Transaction Summary
========================================================================================================
========================================================================================================
=========================
Install 5 Packages
--
users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
