On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Ian Pilcher <arequip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
>>> this output makes sense.
>> I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it
>> drops them from the attempt.
> But why is it trying to include them in the first place?  There are no
> older versions of those packages installed, and they're not dependencies
> of the packages that are being updated.

That's why I requested the debugdata so we know exact dependencies and
your system state where you can reproduce the problem ;). It shows
updating + skipped section together and  should show all packages that
could be updated (like output of check-upgrade).

users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to