On 05/15/18 22:18, Frédéric wrote: >> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515100. >> >> I didn't have a problem when I upgraded a while back. I don't have F27 >> system that >> had been updated from F26. But FWIW the current /etc/pam.d/sddm-greeter >> file contains. >> >> # Setup session >> session required pam_unix.so >> -session optional pam_systemd.so >> -session optional pam_elogind.so > so the difference with mine is just those dash at the start of the > last 2 lines. Is this the same as commenting the lines?
According to the pam.d man page If the type value from the list above is prepended with a - character the PAM library will not log to the system log if it is not possible to load the module because it is missing in the system. This can be useful especially for modules which are not always installed on the system and are not required for correct authentication and authorization of the login session. So, it isn't the same as commenting the line. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
