On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Fred Smith
> <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:08:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> Check this out. After fully charging from this morning?
>>>
>>> [chris@f28h ~]$ upower -i /org/freedesktop/UPower/devices/battery_BAT1
>>>   native-path:          BAT1
>>>   vendor:               Hewlett-Packard
>>>   model:                PABAS0241231
>>>   serial:               41167
>>>   power supply:         yes
>>>   updated:              Thu 17 May 2018 04:59:54 PM MDT (14 seconds ago)
>>>   has history:          yes
>>>   has statistics:       yes
>>>   battery
>>>     present:             yes
>>>     rechargeable:        yes
>>>     state:               fully-charged
>>>     warning-level:       none
>>>     energy:              29.1522 Wh
>>>     energy-empty:        0 Wh
>>>     energy-full:         29.1522 Wh
>>>     energy-full-design:  38.115 Wh
>>>     energy-rate:         0 W
>>>     voltage:             8.671 V
>>>     percentage:          100%
>>>     capacity:            76.4848%
>>>     technology:          lithium-ion
>>>     icon-name:          'battery-full-charged-symbolic'
>>>
>>> [chris@f28h ~]$
>>>
>>> How does capacity go from 82.68% this morning to 76.48% this
>>> afternoon? This laptop is ~18 months old.
>>
>> Doesn't make sense, unless this morning it was "percentage" that was 82.68,
>> not "capacity". (I've certainly misread things like that, and this stuff
>> is hard to understand because there are no explanations given.)
>>>
>>> [root@f28h ~]# cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1/cycle_count
>>> 0
>>>
>>> That's obviously bogus. I'd say 75% of the time I'm working on power,
>>> the other 25% or less of the time it's running on battery. It gets
>>> battery usage once a week or so.
>>
>> I think what that means is that the battery design was such that when
>> new the battery would hold 38.115 Wh, but it has now degraded so that
>> it only holds 29.1522 Wh.
>>
>> if you divide 29.1522/38.115 you get 0.764848, hence the "capacity"
>> now that it has aged a year and a half, is 76.4848% of the original 38.115.
>>
>> You'll notice that "capacity" is 100%, which means it's fully charged
>> for its current place in the battery lifetime curve, i.e., 29.1522 Wh.
>>
>> Lithium Ion batteries age like that, its normal. Eventually you get
>> fed up with it and buy a new battery or a new laptop (or phone or
>> whatever gizmo we're talking about). The very reason why after a lot of
>> customer furor, Apple agreed to replace iphone batteries cheaply rather
>> than raking all those customers of the coals of overly-priced replacement
>> batteries.
>
>
> First posting for this thread is from this morning:
>
>     energy-full:         31.5161 Wh
>     energy-full-design:  38.115 Wh
> ...
>     percentage:          86%
>     capacity:            82.6869%
>
>
> And this afternoon.
>
>     energy-full:         29.1522 Wh
>     energy-full-design:  38.115 Wh
> ...
>     percentage:          100%
>     capacity:            76.4848%
>
>
> Somehow energy-full has changed quite a bit in just 1/2 a day.

And this morning, again powered off and unplugged overnight.

    energy-full:         27.2041 Wh
    energy-full-design:  38.115 Wh


I'm gonna use it in battery all day and let it discharge entirely and
charge it from that state, and see if any of this changes.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R6B4L6365QT25O6JRE5Z2XSWMM5KYCSM/

Reply via email to