On 06/18/18 22:13, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > Upgraded a system from fedora 27 to fedora 28, and went to rebuild > busybox, and it fails with 3 header files missing?
And you don't think telling the list what header files are being reported as missing is a bad idea? > > With Fedora 27 the directory contains a number of header files, but with > fedora 28 it only contains netdb.h?? > > Fedora 27 shows glibc-headers as being the patchage that provides them, > and Fedora 28 has the package install, but a search on it results with no > files > that provides the missing files. > > Reinstalled the package, but still only the one netdb.h file? > > Tried copying the missing files from Fedora 27 to the directory, and it gets > thru the compile process with them, but then gets errors during the link > process, since the libraries must be missing something? > Again, your decision to not name the "missing" files would seem ill advised. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7IZLYUTLJN3FZ5ICF6PG5QTZZRBVLJXW/
