On 07/03/2018 11:39 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/03/2018 10:55 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
"915d709a-49b3-4928-8d5e-0f7e7a4de99a" #1: ignoring informational
payload NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN, msgid=00000000, length=12
Jul 03 18:50:10 xhost NetworkManager[900]: 003
"915d709a-49b3-4928-8d5e-0f7e7a4de99a" #1: received and ignored
informational message
This seems like a message that shouldn't be ignored or else the other
end is labelling it incorrectly. According to that, it appears that
your VPN client side isn't offering a connection setup that the server
accepts. Make sure you have the right configuration.
Specifically, I think it means that either the phase 1 and phase 2
algorithms proposed weren't accepted by the server, or the routes
specified in your configuration aren't acceptable.
For an ipsec/l2tp connection, you don't need to add routes to the ipsec
connection, or use it as the default route. The routing will be
handled/specified in the l2tp layer.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/TZV6IHDTJQ3JABILRQ6LIIKEWUAYG5LU/
