On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 1:57 AM Samuel Sieb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 4/10/25 6:58 PM, home user via users wrote:
> > So I tried "dnf upgrade kernel-devel"...
> >
> > -----
> >
> > Package       Arch   Version         Repository      Size
> > Installing:
> >   kernel-devel x86_64 6.13.9-100.fc40 updates     77.7 MiB
> >
> > Transaction Summary:
> >   Installing:         1 package
> > -----
> >
> > It upgraded, but I need fc41, not fc40.
> >
> > "uname -a" did report that I was using fc41.
>
> Was it you or someone else that got into this same situation recently?

I was the someone else. I had a failed F41 upgrade on an old Proliant
G5. It was the first failed upgrade I have personally experienced.

The hint about Python or Perl symlinks was correct. But after changing
symlinks the machine had other problems. So I did a fresh install on
new hardware, and restored the webserver files from backup.

> What does "rpm -q fedora-release" show you?
>
> You can try "dnf upgrade --releasever=41 kernel-devel" for now.

Jeff
-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to