> I hope the developers reconsider the decision to put extra "locks" > where they are not needed at all.
a) module signing is just a feature you can use if you want b) it's not really a lock. It's only a lock if you decide to enforce module signature checking and not add any keys of your own c) if you build a kernel you own the keys so you can lock it to just what you want. That to many users is quite a valuable tool. Plus of course in its most basic mode of a distro with signing enforcement as shipped it completely and utterly shafts various dubious non GPL out of tree modules 8) Alan -- users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
