On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:12 AM, James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With regards to your suggestion that would result in 5.6 which is a potential > marked change from 5.5 - even more so than mariadb which is why it was kept > at 5.5 this release... If you read the relevant threads in -devel you can > follow the reasoning...
Well, Mozilla has choosen to go with MySQL 5.6. First from Percona to MariaDB and then MySQL... https://twitter.com/sheeri/status/340207301854113793 https://blog.mozilla.org/it/2013/05/30/upgrading-support-mozilla-org-databases/comment-page-1/#comment-2798 It's even faster! The horror! https://blog.mozilla.org/it/2013/01/29/in-subqueries-in-mysql-5-6-are-optimized-away/ But I'm sure MariaDB will suck up the changes in 5.6 in due time and move its exciting developments to its code base... and claim it their own... But the truth is, the bulk of the developers moving MySQL forward seem to be in Oracle's payroll... despite MariaDB propagandists grinding their collective teeth, waving their arms and yelling at the sky... http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvxhzrMX421r4d22do1_400.jpg The rest is FUD... like this (you asked about FUD) tinyurl.com/muktware-liars vs reality http://tinyurl.com/lsvya6f I'm sorry if my point of view is not the mainstream... And no, I won't engage in a flame war, so I'll stop this here. FC -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
