On 1 March 2013 15:05, Chow Loong Jin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/03/2013 11:08, Lex Trotman wrote: >> IIUC that would mean that Geany binaries could not be run on any >> system without libvte9 installed, the user would have to re-compile? >> That doesn't sound acceptable to me. > > Conversely, what's the use-case of having binaries that were built with > libvte9 > support, but run on systems without libvte9 support? Is it somehow desirable > to > not have libvte9 installed?
Well, thats a user decision. Geany is supposed to require few dependencies to run. FWIW I think Matthews suggestion of removing vte and using multiterm is the "right" solution, then only multiterm depends on libvte and it can be a hard depends. Cheers Lex > > -- > Kind regards, > Loong Jin > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
