Hi Fedge, this indeed seems to be a bug/a mistake I made. I've built new packages which should fix that. You will see here as soon as the updates are available:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=geany-plugins Thanks very much for reporting this & Regards, Dominic On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Fedge No <[email protected]> wrote: > Well thanks for your time and the information. I have never really > looked into the workings of the RPM system much. I've been having this > issue since I installed Fedora 25 on a new machine, fresh install. > Here's my dnf run with a few attempts at troubleshooting on my end. > It's been exactly the same since the machine was set up. > > [root@fedge ~]# dnf install geany-plugins-* > Last metadata expiration check: 1:36:46 ago on Wed Dec 14 06:17:33 > 2016. > Error: package geany-plugins-lipsum-1.29-1.fc25.x86_64 obsoletes geany- > plugins-geanylipsum <= 1.28 provided by geany-plugins-geanylipsum-1.28- > 1.fc25.x86_64 > (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting > packages) > [root@fedge ~]# dnf --allowerasing install geany-plugins-* > Last metadata expiration check: 1:37:15 ago on Wed Dec 14 06:17:33 > 2016. > Error: package geany-plugins-lipsum-1.29-1.fc25.x86_64 obsoletes geany- > plugins-geanylipsum <= 1.28 provided by geany-plugins-geanylipsum-1.28- > 1.fc25.x86_64 > [root@fedge ~]# dnf remove geany-plugins-lipsum > No match for argument: geany-plugins-lipsum > Error: No packages marked for removal. > > On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 12:53 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > just to clarify the situation, I actually am the Fedora packager of > > Geany and Geany-Plugins. Even if there probably is a syntax issue in > > the RPM Specfile - which is stated by rpmlint you see some more > > information about this update, beneath some others, the fact that it > > is available in the stable Fedora repositories. There is no single > > Fedora package of Geany-Plugins. It is intended (and usual on Fedora) > > to install stuff this way: > > > > sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*' > > > > > > Regards, > > Dominic > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Fedge No <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > If you have a look at that link it apparently shows that both geany > > > and > > > geany-plugins failed rpmlint, whatever that is. That's probably why > > > the > > > plugins aren't available as a single package. I am not sure why > > > geany > > > itself is. Maybe an older version was provided before the new one > > > failed that lint test. > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:01 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > as far as I can see the current Geany-Plugins 1.29 should be > > > > available in the stable Fedora 25 repositories: > > > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01ad22d5c > > > 5 > > > > > > > > Please note that, with dnf, the usage for the installation > > > changed a > > > > bit and you will have to put quotes around the package pattern: > > > > > > > > sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*' > > > > > > > > However, you are right that the installation instructions on the > > > > website were not up-to-date. This now has been fixed with http:// > > > tiny > > > > .cc/q4qphy > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Dominic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Fedge No <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > The Fedora plugins documentation page is a little outdated. The > > > > > page > > > > > shows to use yum, not dnf and the repo doesn't have a package > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > name geany-plugins. I suppose the yum command is still mapped > > > to > > > > > dnf and > > > > > that would be better for CentOS users or something. I was > > > hoping to > > > > > install them all with one shot but it looks like I will have to > > > do > > > > > them > > > > > individually for now. There seems to be two versions of > > > > > geany-plugins-lipsum that conflict as well so dnf install > > > > > geany-plugins-* doesn't work, either. I don't know if this is > > > all > > > > > intentional but I found it a bit inconvenient. Most people > > > using > > > > > Geany > > > > > probably know how to work around this sort of stuff but it is > > > what > > > > > it is. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Users mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom > > > Webinterface > > > > aus geschrieben habe. > > > > > > > > This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web > > > > interface. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Users mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface > > aus geschrieben habe. > > > > This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web > > interface. > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
