Thank you all for your replays. XMPP vs STUN: STUN is mandatory requirement in our case because CWMP-Client doesn't support XMPP.
BR, Alexei > On 16 March 2016 at 20:07 Zaid Abdulla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 13:05 +0100, Alexei Pastuchov wrote: > > Actually GenieACS doesn't match the requirements because lack of NAT- > > Support. But it looks like Notification-based Approach (G.2.2.2.2 > > https://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-069_Amendment- > > 5.pdf ) could be done with justifiable effort and I consider to > > contribute to the GenieACS project in this way. I'll gladly support > > you if you are working on the solution already. > > We prioritize features based mainly on the needs of our the needs of > our commercial clients and, to a lesser extent, popular demand from the > community. This is not requested often and since it's deprecated in the > latest amendment, the new XMPP based approach will likely be > implemented first. Having said that, we'd gladly take your money to > implement it :) Or you may implement it yourself and I can provide my > feedback when needed. > > > Does any ISP use GenieACS in business production environment already? > > If so, which kind of CPE you company uses? > > I have no record of how many production deployments are out there. But > we do manage quite a few ourselves. If GenieACS meets your > requirements, then you have nothing to worry about in that regard. > > Zaid _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
