Hello Norman, Thanks for your feedback.
On 14.05.21 10:41, Norman Feske wrote: > If file-system performance was our priority, I would intuitively know > where to look first, without new benchmarks. > Regarding file-system integrity and reliability, the answer is much > easier. Data loss would be a critical bug. So if we are presented with a > reproducible test that triggers such a case, we will immediately make it > our top priority. Optimizing the performance of file systems isn't our priority either as we don't have any concrete requirements for this. Instead, our main goals with such a test suite are: a) Increase the test coverage of the file systems provided by Genode in order to transparently and continuously demonstrate the quality of the framework and to make sure regressions won't go unnoticed once a file system component is being used in a product. b) Compare file system scenarios available in Genode. Would you see value in such tests? Kind regards Stefan -- Freundliche Grüsse Stefan Thöni Chairman of the Board Senior Security Architect +41 79 610 64 95 gapfruit AG Baarerstrasse 135 6300 Zug https://gapfruit.com
OpenPGP_0x99A5F4B3D4E372A6.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Genode users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.genode.org/listinfo/users
