Hey, On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 13:50:44 CEST, Duss Pirmin wrote: > The new code is much less invasive. I'm currently debugging, why > do_settimeofday64() accesses address 0x0. > Maybe I'm calling it too early but I think, that I will figure this out.
Hm, that's unfortunate... Did you have a look into read_persistent_clock64() (timekeeping.c in Linux)? Maybe this is even less invasive than calling do_settimeofday64() as you may just implement the function that is defined "weak" in timekeeping.c. The related call chain is timekeeping_init() -> read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset() -- weak -> read_persistent_clock64 -- weak Greets -- Christian Helmuth Genode Labs https://www.genode-labs.com/ · https://genode.org/ https://twitter.com/GenodeLabs · https://genodians.org/ Genode Labs GmbH · Amtsgericht Dresden · HRB 28424 · Sitz Dresden Geschäftsführer: Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske, Christian Helmuth _______________________________________________ Genode users mailing list users@lists.genode.org https://lists.genode.org/listinfo/users
