On 11/15/05, Martin Maly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Either that (which I don't like very much the idea of adding keywords as it > modifies the underlying language), or finding some way to express that the > class I am deriving from .NET class should be sealed. That should get us > there also, even though the code to do events would probably not be as slick > as it is in C#.
given a mechanism to produce or transform a class into a sealed class (if that's a sensible notion in the first place), then function/method decorators could be used to express the transformation. i think that's the kind of thing for which decorators are intended. (i, also, cringe at the even the thought of adding a new keyword...) ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
