Dino, Fully understood! IronPython looks good for such an early version! I am looking forward to future releases of IronPython for performance, but continue trying the beta out with SimPy in the meantime.
Klaus Müller > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Dino Viehland > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:01 PM > To: Discussion of IronPython; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Simpy-Developer List' > Subject: [Simpy-users] RE: [IronPython] SimPy on IronPython > timing test > > Thanks for the report Klaus. Currently we're mostly focused > on correctness but later in the beta cycle we're going to > come back and target perf pretty heavily. I've gone ahead > and filed this in our bug database so we won't miss it when > we get to that point. > > > Do you want to help develop Dynamic languages on CLR? > (http://members.microsoft.com/careers/search/details.aspx?JobI > D=6D4754DE-11F0-45DF-8B78-DC1B43134038) > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaus Muller > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Simpy-Developer List' > Cc: users@lists.ironpython.com > Subject: [IronPython] SimPy on IronPython timing test > > All: > I have run a first simple benchmark to compare SimPy under > IronPython with SimPy under CPython. I ran the following program: > > from SimPy.Simulation import * > import time > > class Dum(Process): > def run(self): > yield hold,self,3 > initialize() > nrProcs=int(raw_input("Nr of processes?")) > processes=[Dum("Dum%s"%x) for x in range(1,nrProcs)] > > for i in range(nrProcs): > p=Dum("%s"%i) > activate(p,p.run(),at=i) > > tStart=(time.clock(),time.time()) > simulate(until=2*nrProcs) > print "Ran in %s seconds for %s > processes"%((time.clock()-tStart[0],time.time()-tStart[1]),nrProcs) > raw_input("Hit any key . . .") > > Here are the results: > > Nr processes=10000 > ------------------ > IronPython: 2.06 seconds > CPython: 0.5 seconds > > Nr processes=50000 > ------------------ > IronPython: 15.53 seconds > CPython: 3.67 seconds > > At this moment, IronPython is clearly way slower than CPython > on this benchmark. > > Clearly, it is early days for IronPython (this was run under > beta release 2) and its developers will surely still optimize > its performance a lot. > > If Microsoft actually support IronPython, this will be an > important SimPy platform in the future and we will have to > watch its further development. > > Klaus Müller > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep > through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX > search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as > surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd___________________________ > ____________________ > Simpy-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simpy-users > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
