Charlie Moad wrote: >> Take away decorator support and you'll lose at least this Python >> programmer... >> Decorators and attributes have at least some commonality, which is why >> this syntax ended up in Python in the first place... >> Allowing decorator syntax in places CPython doesn't is better than not >> allowing it where it does... >> > > So it sounds like people want decorator syntax for attributes. Would > it be sufficient to check for inheritance from System.Attribute to > distinguish the two? Sounds very good.
> Also attributes being classes and decorators > functions might help. Can't CPython decorators also be classes (I haven't tried this) ? Michael Foord http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml > I agree it is better to allow the decorator > syntax in more places than cpython than the alternative. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 14/09/2006 _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
