On 9/15/06, J. Merrill <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was referring to this for 1.1. Or are you saying that some part of the licensing / legalistic stuff that goes on (invisibly to many of us) means that you can't put any "outsider contributions" into what you ship?
At 01:02 PM 9/15/2006, Dino Viehland wrote
>Unfortunately we cannot currently accept changes back into the IronPython core right now. :(
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of J. Merrill
>Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:58 AM
>To: Discussion of IronPython
>Subject: Re: [IronPython] socket for IronPython update
>
>Is there a reason not to pick up Seo's version? His "license" ("do whatever ... you want") would certainly allow it. Is the wheel he built not round enough?
>
>At 11:40 AM 9/11/2006, Dino Viehland wrote
>>Originally we were trying to implement "_socket" instead of "socket". We ran into one problem with this: the standard socket.py module has an implicit dependency upon CPython's reference counting garbage collector (for implementing dup). We considered a hack to make this work but ultimately rejected it in favor of implementing "socket" instead replacing the standard Python module. Unfortunately makefile didn't make it - and that looks like the same thing for ssl (it's present in CPythons socket but not _socket).
>>
>>Select was a much simpler case of just not getting to it in time. We'll ship a select implementation w/ the 1.1 release - we'll need to look at makefile & ssl though (makefile should be trivial, hopefully ssl will be just as trivial).
J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
