On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:18 PM, KE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -X:SaveAssemblies is for debugging purposes and does not produce >> output equivalent to that produced by pyc.py. > > Okay, but my question still stands of whether or not part or all of the > function of pyc.py should be moved into the DLR (obviously with some virtual > methods for implementers)?
The bulk of the compiler code is actually in the DLR and in IronPython itself. pyc.py is a user-friendly wrapper around that functionality. There's no reason you couldn't use pyc.py to compile itself, if you wanted to distribute it in a binary form. If you've got a real-world scenario that you don't think we've adequately addressed, you'll need to provide more information before we can understand the shortcomings of this approach. -- Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
