I think this says it all = Duck Typing, Tuple, Open Class, method_missing ..
class C
{
public dynamic myField;
public dynamic MyProp { get; set; }
public dynamic MyMethod(dynamic d)
{
return d.Foo();
}
public delegate dynamic MyDelegate(dynamic d);
}
and this IDynamicObject interface
public class MyDynamicObject : IDynamicObject
{
public MetaObject GetMetaObject(Expression parameter)
{
return new MyMetaObject(parameter);
}
}
and meta object overrides
public class MyMetaObject : MetaObject
{
public MyMetaObject(Expression parameter)
: base(parameter, Restrictions.Empty)
{
}
public override MetaObject Call(CallAction action, MetaObject[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("Call of method {0}", action.Name);
return this;
}
public override MetaObject SetMember(SetMemberAction action,
MetaObject[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("SetMember of property {0}", action.Name);
return this;
}
public override MetaObject GetMember(GetMemberAction action,
MetaObject[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("GetMember of property {0}", action.Name);
return this;
}
}
https://blogs.msdn.com/cburrows/archive/2008/10/28/c-dynamic-part-ii.aspx
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Dody Gunawinata
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hmm..is there any hosted VPC made available? I'm based in Cairo and a 23GB
> download will probably tie up the whole bandwidth of Africa.
> Dody G.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Watch the the videos from the PDC, once they're posted. I know that some
>> of your questions about use of DynamicObject from within C# are answered by
>> Jim Hugunin's talk. Also, if you can download the 23 GB(!) VPC image with
>> the Visual Studio 2010 CTP, you'll be able to try the walkthroughs -- and I
>> think that one specifically addresses the XML scenario.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Dody Gunawinata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I'd call it missed opportunity if what C# 4.0 dynamic does is only to
>>> provide the same facilities that VB6 or VB.Net have provided long time ago.
>>> For example, the COM interop thing is nice, but then for the past 8 years
>>> you know that if you want to script some Office or COM objects you don't use
>>> C# or IronPython or (insert dynamic language).
>>> But it looks like there are more here. DynamicObject type and
>>> IDynamicObject looks intriguing and I wonder it finally allows more natural
>>> XML or ActiveRecord object access via property call
>>> like myDocument.Customer.Name.FirstName without resorting to some static
>>> code generation. I also wonder if this also allows C# to simulate open
>>> classes just by putting a hashtable of object and stuff delegate, data,
>>> property into them .
>>>
>>>
>>> Dody G.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:36:05 +0200, "Dody Gunawinata"
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> > Yup. It looks like more information needed on all of these dynamic
>>>> features.
>>>> > In the first glance it looks like C# 4.0 is turning into VB 6 :)
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that would be a bad thing? Let us recall that VB6 was
>>>> arguably the most successful release in Visual Basic history. There are
>>>> still people who won't allow themselves to be dragged away from VB6,
>>>> more than a decade after its release.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users@lists.ironpython.com
>>>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> nomadlife.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@lists.ironpython.com
>>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> nomadlife.org
>
>
--
nomadlife.org
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
