One qualifying remark to add here - we will continue to ensure we build against 
.NET 3.5 and above from the DLR's CodePlex source repository, not IronPython's. 
 If anyone's interested in doing this today simply:
1. Navigate to http://dlr.codeplex.com/SourceControl/list/changesets
2. Download a source zip file of your choosing
3. Unzip it and build the "v2Release" configuration of 
"DLR_Main\Solutions\CodePlex-DLR.sln" as opposed to the "Release" configuration 
of "IronPython_Main\Solutions\IronPython.sln"

Just out of curiosity, how many people out there care about building IronPython 
against .NET 2.0/.NET 3.5?  I'd hope not too many considering the improvements 
you'll get by running .NET 4.0 based IronPython assemblies - see 
http://knowbody.livejournal.com/20751.html :)

Thanks,

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dino Viehland
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:57 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.6 CodePlex Source Update

But I think we do intend to ensure that we still build on .NET 3.5 and above - 
we just won't be releasing those binaries ourselves.  .NET 2.0
SP1 will be dropped completely and we won't be doing our normal extensive test 
passes on .NET 3.5.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users- 
> boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dave Fugate
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:38 AM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.6 CodePlex Source Update
> 
> That's our current thinking.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users- 
> boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 9:01 AM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.6 CodePlex Source Update
> 
> > - .NET 4.0 is required for 2.7, not .NET 2.0 SP1
> 
> So does this mean there won't be a version of 2.7 for .NET 2.0? Fine 
> by me - supporting both for 2.6 is a pain.
> 
> - Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Reply via email to