Hello, On 11/21/08 10:05, Gawith wrote: > Thanks guys, > > after inspecting the source code I already expected something like that :-( > there are solutions to go even now, I had the impression you want to do it using failure_route...
Check this: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/tm.html#id2506624 If t_relay() returns -6 then it is the case of send error, so you can continue after it with something else: t_relay("0x02"); switch($rc) { case -6: # do your send-failover logic here break; } Cheers, Daniel > Cheers > > > Klaus Darilion schrieb: > >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 11/20/08 16:05, Gawith wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> is there a way to realize TCP fail over? >>>> With UDP, I check for 408s in the failure route and react accordingly. >>>> With TCP, the tm modules sends out a 477 without any chance for me to >>>> interfere. >>>> >>>> >>> it is a known issue, put in discussion on devel mailing list, also >>> mentioned in the agenda of last devel meeting.: >>> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/development:irc-meeting-agenda-06-11-2008 >>> >>> >>> It is in my to-do list for the next release - just check devel mailing >>> list archive for more info: >>> http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/devel/ >>> >> So, to answer the question - there is no way to handle this smart. >> >> Of course there is the dirty workaround to loop the message through >> Kamailio to catch the 477. >> >> regards >> klaus >> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.kamailio.org > http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
