Victor Pascual Ávila wrote: >>> It is not a clear bet to me -- in fact I fell a bit ashamed I may be >>> giving up >>> on ICE too early. Still I do. Does anyone have a memory of a technology that >>> was "clean", came late and surpassed "internet workarounds"? >>> >> The question could be the other way around: does anyone remember another >> technology that needed so many patches and workarounds :-)? Just >> thinking about the number of RFCs and drafts coming to >> complete/recommend/give usage guidelines ... >> >> ICE came too late, the are millions of end user devices sold out there, >> without it. And as "workarounds" are in place, nobody will invest now >> (crisis :-) ?!?!) to replace them -- only the time will obsolete them. >> So we still have to stick to the solutions we have now. > > I agree with what Daniel says. However, if we keep stuck to the > solutions we have now we'll never obsolete them.
Probably. -jiri _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
