On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Juan Asencio wrote: > Carrierroute is assigning the correct host address. So I guess that works, > but I'm worried about the invite, that is send with ip address of the > kamailio, instead of the one assigned by carrierroute. > > Do you think the address would change if it could find host address > assigned by cr?
Hi Juan, >> U 2009/02/18 12:40:51.606688 192.168.50.118:8236 -> 192.168.50.93:5060 >> INVITE sip:456...@192.168.50.93 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 192.168.50.118:8236; >> >> U 2009/02/18 12:40:51.611241 192.168.50.93:5060 -> 192.168.50.118:8236 >> SIP/2.0 100 Giving a try..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.118:8236; >> >> U 2009/02/18 12:40:51.612321 192.168.50.93:5060 -> 192.158.50.114:5060 >> INVITE sip:456...@192.168.50.93 SIP/2.0..Record-Route: .118 is the address of your test box, .114 the kamailio and .93 the gateway? Yes, cr should rewrite the request uri to the one in its table. I just tested with a non existing host name on my system (test.box): Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: uri 49721123456787 was rewritten to sip:49721123456...@test.box:7000, carrier 0, domain 10 Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: CRITICAL:core:mk_proxy: could not resolve hostname: "test.box" Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: ERROR:tm:uri2proxy: bad host name in URI <sip:49721123456...@test.box:7000> Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches Cheers, Henning _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
