Thank you guys for your valuable comments.
We have heard that before, that Asterisk has problems in a large scale 
environment. In your experience what specifically are the problems: the 
registrations are lost, the records get corrupted etc. We ask because with 
small deployments we have not seen those issues yet and want to know form 
people that actually have implemented large scale deployments.

Also, with what they call  Real Time Asterisk using DBs, does that help somehow?

I know this is not an Asterisk forum but I am expecting to get a more unbiased 
response here than on a asterisk specific forum.

thank you in advance

jp







----- Original Message ----
From: Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>
To: Henning Westerholt <henning.westerh...@1und1.de>
Cc: users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:04:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Handling of REGISTER messages when Kamilio is in 
front of Asterisk

Henning Westerholt wrote:

>> [using asterisk for REGISTER]
>> We have never done it that way and we are not sure whether it is possible or 
>> not, whether it is acceptable SIP-wise or not
> 
> Relaying the REGISTER to asterisk will work probably, but i'd use the 
> solution 
> were i'm comfortable with and confident that it will work out in the end.

A proxy can statefully relay anything, so this definitely works.  I just 
don't think it's the right approach here.

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web    : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel    : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



      


_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to