Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2009/4/1 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at>: > >>> But I really wonder why you need to remove the To tag in an in-dialog >>> request. >>> >> A common use case is a SIP client which gets confused by multiple early >> dialogs (e.g. Asterisk in pedenatic mode). Just remove the totags from the >> responses 101-199 and you are done. > > Wow! Asterisk in pedantic mode (theorically this means more RFC 3261 > compliant) requires To tag in provisional 1XX responses to be removed > in case of getting forked responses!
At least that was the case ~1 year ago. I have not tried current versions. And yes - Asterisk is buggy in both modes :-) klaus > What will be the next? requiring just one Via header? requiring > media address in SDP being the same as address in Contact header? > requiring a new propietary header "Require: x-digium" ? > > Amazing. > _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
