On Friday 10 April 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote: > > I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that > > LCR can be used to handle tariff , i.e, > > selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this > > capability at all. but carrier route , according to LCR, scales better > > than LCR. > > what you mean by "according to LCR"? i'm not familiar with carrier > route, but i don't see any other scaling limits with LCR except memory > for lcr and gw entries. > > perhaps carrier route does not keep its corresponding entries in memory, > but fetches them each time from database?
Hi Juha, no, it also keeps the entries in the memory, it don't do any run-time DB operations for normal routing. Perhaps the original poster referred to the pre 1.5.0 state, before your refactoring of the LCR code base. I'll see if i can update the cr README a bit. Cheers, Henning _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
