Thanks for the suggestion Jiri. So far I have been monitoring sr and I know that the TCP async implementation might resolve some problems we're facing with kamailio.
But I'm a bit conservative and I want to do several verifications of sr before doing the "switch". So for now we stick to kamailio. Does this TCP supervisor process priority sounds familiar to you for tuning kamailio ? Regards, Pascal On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Jiri Kuthan <j...@iptel.org> wrote: > if you are concerned about TCP performance (Which may be a justified > concern -- from any possible viewpoint TCP is not easy for SIP), > I suggest you consider the sip-router core. There has been (and I think > still will be) tremendous effort put in it. > > -jiri > > Pascal Maugeri wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I recently read the following in order to optimize OpenSER in handling >> TCP connections: >> >> "First, the TCP supervisor process must be given an elevated priority >> level in order to prevent anomalous behavior due to the Linux >> scheduler." >> >> First of all, as this is quite old paper (it refers to OpenSER 1.2), >> I'm wondering if such a tuning is still needed for Kamailio 1.5 branch >> ? If yes, how can I do this ? >> >> Regards, >> Pascal >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list >> Users@lists.kamailio.org >> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >>
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
