15 feb 2010 kl. 09.25 skrev Asterisk User: > Hi Group, > I know this issue has to do bit more with SIP and off from kamailio problems, > but just wanted to know your opinions on this. > I have my sip extensions registered to kamilio and Asterisk works as a > voicemail server. > Now to implement MWI i send NOTIFY packet from Asterisk to Kamailio and from > kamailio to SIP extension (Grandstream GXP2000). > here is the packet that travels from kamailio to extension and the response > sent from extension to kamilio. > =========================== > NOTIFY sip:1111...@arzoo.com SIP/2.0 > Max-Forwards: 10 > Record-Route: <sip:172.18.100.74;lr;nat=yes> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.74;branch=z9hG4bK3c3.e1003f03.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.1:45382;received=172.18.100.73;branch=z9hG4bK.4f83530d;rport=45382;alias > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.73:5060 > From: <sip:1...@arzoo.com> > To: <sip:1111...@arzoo.com> > Contact: <sip:1111...@arzoo.com> > Call-ID: 4d61cf9e505d40e905032a18329d6...@172.19.100.42 > CSeq: 1 NOTIFY > User-Agent: VoiceMail > Event: message-summary > Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary > Content-Length: 39 > > =========================== > SIP/2.0 415 Unacceptable Content-Type > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.74;branch=z9hG4bK3c3.02003f03.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.1:43416;received=172.18.100.73;branch=z9hG4bK.7be73901;rport=43416;alias > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.73:5060 > Record-Route: <sip:172.18.100.74;lr;nat=yes> > From: <sip:1...@arzoo.com> > To: <sip:1111...@arzoo.com>;tag=3c6ba3e4a93d6864 > Call-ID: 4d61cf9e505d40e905032a18329d6...@172.19.100.42 > CSeq: 1 NOTIFY > User-Agent: Grandstream GXP2000 1.1.4.14 > Accept: application/sdp, application/simple-message-summary, > application/octet-stream, application/dialog-info+xml, application/pidf+xml, > message/sipfrag;version=2.0 > Content-Length: 0 > > =========================== > Please guide me in right direction to get rid of 'Unacceptable Content-Type' > problem. > Thanks in advance,
The Content-Type that Asterisk is using in the Notify packet is actually listed in the Accept: header of the error message. I would send this as a bug report to Grandstream, unless someone else on the list figures it out. /O _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users