El Viernes, 26 de Febrero de 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: > On 02/26/2010 03:09 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > El Viernes, 26 de Febrero de 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: > >> Do you re-engage rtpproxy for re-INVITEs? > > > > Yes, the client is behind NAT so I must use RtpProxy for initial INVITE. > > Then, if I don't re-engage rtpproxy for re-INVITE RtpProxy would receive > > RTP in already working ports but from a different source, so RtpProxy > > would reject/ignore such RTP traffic. > > > >> Also, have you played with > >> force rtp proxy flags to trust public addresses? > > > > But that wouldn't solve the problem, am I wrong? > > there is a deadlock when chaining two rtpproxy. In learning mode > rtpproxy waits for the other side to send first packet to know the ip > and port. iirc it is r flag to avoid this.
Interesting, I'll try it and will comment the result. Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
