I've been using the oldish (2003) mpijava of late.
It holds up pretty well with modern mpis, but certain 
jvms persist in causing extra copies, using SEGV as
a means of process control, etc.

If you don't need "true" sun java compatibility, you
can also use gcj (gcc suite) or titanium (berkeley)
in combination or instead of mpi.

I would really like to get my hands on the CNI (gcj)
binding of mpiJava once reported, but haven't been able
to find the source anywhere.

Ben

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 01:15:12PM -0400, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> There are various projects out there that provide bindings in different
> languages -- most (if not all?) simply layer on top of the native C
> bindings, so you should be able to run them with Open MPI (disclaimer: I
> have not tried any of these).
> 
> I know that I have seen MPI bindings for Java (there's several packages
> out there, but I don't know if any of them are recent).  Some googling
> shows Perl and Python bindings:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/pympi/ 
> http://search.cpan.org/~josh/Parallel-MPI-0.03/MPI.pm
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org 
> > [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Luigi Paioro
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:05 PM
> > To: us...@open-mpi.org
> > Subject: [OMPI users] Python, Perl and Java bindings
> > 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > A quick question.
> > 
> > Is anybody developing the OpenMPI bindings for Perl, Python and Java?
> > 
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > Luigi
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > us...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to