I think that we've fixed everything with respect to f90 except the "large" interface. Let us know if we either missed something or you find something new.
Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kluskens [mailto:mklusk...@ieee.org] Sent: Mon Jun 12 09:47:52 2006 To: Open MPI Users Subject: Re: [OMPI users] F90 interfaces again On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Michael Kluskens wrote: > >> call MPI_WAITALL(3,sp_request,MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE,ier) >> 1 >> Error: Generic subroutine 'mpi_waitall' at (1) is not consistent with >> a specific subroutine interface >> >> Issue, 3rd argument of MPI_WAITALL expects an integer array normally, >> but this constant is permitted by the standard. >> >> This is with OpenMPI 1.2a1r10186, I can check the details of the >> scripts and generated files next week for whatever is the latest >> version. But odds are this has not been spotted. > > Michael - > > Which compiler are you using? I'm trying to replicate, and > gfortran isn't getting mad at me (which is weird, because I would > have expected it to get very angry at me). I'm using g95 and I configure with: ./configure F77=g95 FC=g95 LDFLAGS=-lSystemStubs --with-mpi-f90- size=large --enable-static --with-f90-max-array-dim=3 Downloaded "openmpi-1.2a1r10297" today. Looking at the scripts I believe this problem was fixed between 10186 and 10297. I can't test until I check for and if needed implement my fixes to the other interfaces I mentioned previously. Michael _______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
