On Oct 25, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Edgar Gabriel wrote:
If you have the following scenario:
- A spawns B, gets intercomm AB
- A spawns C, gets intercomm AC (that does not include B)
- ...repeat N times (e.g., to AN)
well, how about the following for your example:
- D = intercomm_merge (AB)
- E = intercomm_merge (AC)
- F = intercomm_create (DC, using E as bridge-communicator)
I had to think about this for quite a while before I understood it --
I initially assumed that "DC" was a typo and you really meant "DE".
But I eventually understood that "DC" is exactly what you meant and
that seems to adhere to the spec.
Yes, that's a clever solution. Good show!
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
