On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:54 AM, Sangamesh B wrote:

The fortran application I'm using here is the CPMD-3.11.

I don't think the processor is Nehalem:

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5472  @ 3.00GHz

Installation procedure was same on both the clusters. I've not set mpi_affinity.

This is a memory intensive application, but this job was not using
that much amount of memory.

Regarding CPU & ELAPSED TIMEs, the CPU TIME should be greater than
ELAPSED TIME in general (for a parallel program). Right?


It depends on exactly what you're reporting for ELAPSED time. Is that wall clock time? Or user time? Or something else?

Ralph and I disagree on this point, but my opinion is that the only meaningful time reported in a parallel application is the wall clock time. The CPU time can be badly skewed by a variety of things, such as any filesystem IO, network activity (depending on whether you have an OS-bypass network or not), etc.

--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems

Reply via email to