On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:24:07PM -0400, Luis Vitorio Cargnini wrote:
> Thanks, but I really do not want to use Boost.
> Is easier ? certainly is, but I want to make it using only MPI
> itself
> and not been dependent of a Library, or templates like the majority
> of
> boost a huge set of templates and wrappers for different libraries,
> implemented in C, supplying a wrapper for C++.
> I admit Boost is a valuable tool, but in my case, as much
> independent I
> could be from additional libs, better.

If you do not want to use boost, then I suggest not using nested
vectors but just ones that contain PODs as value_type (or even

If you insist on using complicated containers you will end up
writing your own MPI-C++ abstraction (resulting in a library). This
will be a lot of (unnecessary and hard) work.

Just my 2 cents.



Reply via email to