Hi Justin I think you are confusing OpenMP and OpenMPI.
You sound like you're using OpenMP. This mailing list is for OpenMPI, a specific implementation of MPI. OpenMP and MPI, while having some overlapping aims, are completely separate. I suggest you post your query to an OpenMP mailing list. Ciao Terry On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:56 -0500, Justin Watson wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > > I have come across a situation where I am trying to > make private variables that passed to subroutines using modules. Here > is the situation, The main program calls two different routines. > These routines are functionally different but utilize the same > variable names for some global data which are contained in a module > (this was done to make the passing of the data easy to various levels > of subroutines it is not needed outside the subroutine chain). I am > using workshare constructs to run each of these routines on its own > thread. I would like to make the data in the module private to that > thread. When I set the variable to private it still behaves as if it > were shared. If I pass the variable to the routines via an argument > list everything is fine (this will cause me to re-write a bunch of > code). The question is … shouldn’t this work within the context of a > module as well? > > > > I have been getting different result using different > compilers. I have tried Lahey and Intel and they both show signs of > not handling this properly. I have attach a small test problem that > mimics what I am doing in the large code. > > > > Justin K. Watson > Email: jkw...@arl.psu.edu > > Research Assistant > Phone: (814) 863-6754 > > Computational Methods Development Department > Fax: (814) 865-3287 > > > > > > Applied Research Laboratory > > The Pennsylvania State University > > P.O. Box 30 > > State College, Pa 16804-0030 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
