Hello Brian,
You do not have to be sorry. my code was not that clear.
My Open MPI version is 1.6, the network is Ethernet.
About the MPI_Alloc_mem, I tried with malloc also, but was getting the same
seg-fault.
Thanks,
Ziaul
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Barrett, Brian W <bwba...@sandia.gov> wrote:
> Ziaul -
>
> You're right, I totally misread the code, sorry about that. What version
> of Open MPI are you using and over what network?
>
> As an aside, there's no point in using MPI_ALLOC_MEM for the displacement
> arrays. MPI_ALLOC_MEM is really only advantageous for allocating
> communication buffers. Since you know the displacement arrays aren't
> going to be used for communication, you're just tying up (potentially
> scarce) network resources by using MPI_ALLOC_MEM there.
>
> Biran
>
> On 6/6/12 11:24 AM, "Ziaul Haque Olive" <mzh.ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello Brian,
> >
> >Actually, I am not modifying the local communication buffer that contains
> >the data. I am modifying the the buffer that contains the indices of the
> >data buffer(source_disp and target_disp).
> >
> >in MPICH2 this is not a problem. I am not sure about Open MPI.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ziaul
> >
> >On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Barrett, Brian W <bwba...@sandia.gov>
> >wrote:
> >
> >Ziaul -
> >
> >Your program is erroneous; you can not modify the local communication
> >buffer of an MPI_ACCUMULATE call until after the next synchronization call
> >(Section 11.3 of MPI 2.2). In your example, that would be after the
> >MPI_FENCE call following the call to MPI_ACCUMULATE.
> >
> >Brian
> >
> >On 6/6/12 9:44 AM, "Ziaul Haque Olive" <mzh.ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I am not sure, if my code is correct according to Open MPI(v1.6). the
> >> code is given as follows, I am doing MPI one-sided communication inside
> >> a function - data_transfer. this function is being called inside a
> >>fence epoch. inside data_transfer, I am allocating memory for
> >>non-contiguous data, creating derived data type, using this datatype in
> >>MPI_Accumulate, and after calling MPI_Accumulate, freeing the indexed
> >>data type and also freeing the memory containing indices for indexed
> >>data type. is it okay that I am freeing memory for derived datatype
> >>before the closing
> >>fence?
> >>
> >>I am getting segmentation fault with this code. if I comment out the
> >>MPI_Accumulate call, then no seg-fault occurs.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>void data_transfer(void *data, int
> >>*sources_disp, int *targets_disp, int *target, int size, int *blength,
> >>int func, MPI_Op op, MPI_Win win, MPI_Datatype dtype){
> >>
> >> int i,j, index;
> >> int tmp_target;
> >> int *flag;
> >> int *source_disp;
> >> int *target_disp;
> >> MPI_Datatype source_type, target_type;
> >>
> >>
> >> MPI_Alloc_mem( size*sizeof(int), MPI_INFO_NULL, &source_disp);
> >> MPI_Alloc_mem( size*sizeof(int), MPI_INFO_NULL, &target_disp);
> >> MPI_Alloc_mem( size*sizeof(int), MPI_INFO_NULL, &flag );
> >>
> >> memset(flag, 0, size*sizeof(int));
> >>
> >> for(i=0;i<size;i++){
> >> if(flag[i]==0){
> >> tmp_target = target[i];
> >>
> >> index = 0;
> >> for(j=i; j<size; j++){
> >> if(flag[j]==0 && tmp_target == target[j] ){
> >> source_disp[index] = sources_disp[j];
> >> target_disp[index] = targets_disp[j];
> >> //printf("src, target disp %d %d\n", j, disp[j]);
> >> index++;
> >> flag[j] = 1;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> MPI_Type_indexed(index, blength , source_disp, dtype,
> >>&source_type);
> >> MPI_Type_commit(&source_type);
> >> MPI_Type_indexed(index, blength , target_disp, dtype,
> >>&target_type);
> >> MPI_Type_commit(&target_type);
> >>
> >>
> >> MPI_Accumulate( data, 1, source_type, tmp_target, 0, 1,
> >>target_type , op, win);
> >>
> >> MPI_Type_free(&source_type);
> >> MPI_Type_free(&target_type);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> MPI_Free_mem(source_disp);
> >> MPI_Free_mem(target_disp);
> >> MPI_Free_mem(flag);
> >>
> >>}
> >>
> >>void main(){
> >> int i;
> >> while(i<N){
> >> MPI_Win_fence(MPI_MODE_NOPRECEDE, queue2_win);
> >>
> >> data_transfer();
> >>
> >> MPI_Win_fence(MPI_MODE_NOSUCCEED, queue2_win);
> >> }
> >>}
> >>
> >>thanks,
> >>Ziaul
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>users mailing list
> >>us...@open-mpi.org
> >>http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> >
> >
> >--
> > Brian W. Barrett
> > Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
> > Sandia National Laboratories
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >users mailing list
> >us...@open-mpi.org
> >http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >users mailing list
> >us...@open-mpi.org
> >http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>
> --
> Brian W. Barrett
> Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
> Sandia National Laboratories
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
